Time saved / month
Fill in the required inputs
Hours of human labor freed, before quality adjustment.
Time saved, hard-dollar savings, soft capacity, and payback — every output a range, not a point. The math is on the page. The assumptions are on the page. The hard-vs-soft split is answered by you, not hidden in a footnote.
Every output on this page is a range: low · expected · high. Every input is uncertain — handle times are medians, exception rates vary by team, AI cost per execution varies week-to-week. A single point estimate implies precision that doesn't exist.
The confidence band below controls how wide the range is. 20% is the default. Widen it if you're estimating. Narrow it if every input came from system data.
Workflow identity. Two fields — name and analysis date — so this calc is found again and attached to a pilot.
Executions per month. Steady state, not peak. If seasonality matters, use the average over the last six months of comparable months — not the busiest one.
The pre-pilot state. Total minutes per execution including rework — if the workflow is 6 minutes of work with 20% rework, enter 7.2, not 6.
The post-pilot state. Includes the automated portion and the HITL review portion. Exception rate is the percentage of executions where a human actually intervenes.
The cost to run the workflow. Per-execution cost is token/API spend. Fixed is the platform fee. One-time is setup, integration, and initial training.
When the workflow saves 4 minutes per execution, what happens to those 4 minutes? If nothing — the team just works a bit less each day — there is no money saved; there is capacity. If headcount drops or contract labor ends, there is. Most tools add these together and call it ROI. This one won't.
Every figure is a range. The low and high ends come from your confidence band, applied to net savings per execution. The expected value uses your inputs directly. The math is in the expandable block below — check it yourself.
Time saved / month
Fill in the required inputs
Hours of human labor freed, before quality adjustment.
Hard-dollar savings / month
—
The portion of saved labor that leaves the budget. Zero if you chose "soft".
Soft capacity / month
—
Hours redeployed, not cash saved. Real value, different line item.
Payback period
—
Months to recover one-time cost from net savings. Uses hard-dollar savings only.
Every line below uses only the inputs you provided. Recalculate by hand if you want — anything you can't reproduce line-for-line is a bug, not a feature.
Assumption list is included in the CSV/JSON export. Attach it to the ROI number when you share it — a range without its assumptions is a guess.
The case study from the hub's regional insurer case, run through this calculator. It shows what a filled-in analysis looks like, and why the hard-vs-soft question matters.
Most ROI tools would report $28,000/month in "savings" — the full labor substitution before the hard/soft split. That number doesn't survive a budget review, because only 60% of it is actually hard dollars. This calculator reports $17,000 hard and $11,000 of capacity as two different things, and the payback uses only the hard number. Slower payback. Defensible payback.
Five specific refusals. They're visible so you can hold the tool to them — and because most ROI calculators will happily do all five.
Every output is a range. If you screenshot the "expected" number and hide the range, you've defeated the tool. The range is the deliverable.
Those are finance models. This tool produces workflow-level inputs; the finance partner produces cash-flow timing, discount rate, and horizon. Two different jobs.
Employee satisfaction, CSAT improvements, reduced cognitive load — real, valuable, and not money. Don't ask this tool to include them. Put them in the narrative, not the model.
"If the workflow is 3 min faster, four downstream decisions get faster, which saves…" — that's a different model. This one prices the workflow in front of you.
This is the analysis the board deck rests on. Present the range and the assumptions, not the "expected" figure alone. If your board deck promises a single number, the deck is lying to itself.
The calculator is the last of the four chain tools. With a range in hand, the workflow enters Expand — or, if the range says stop, the pilot plan's stop rule kicks in.
Because every input is uncertain. Handle time is a median across many workflows; HITL exception rate varies by team; AI cost per execution depends on token usage that varies week-to-week. A single point estimate implies precision that doesn't exist.
The range is a statement about confidence, not hedging — a good calculator tells you how much it doesn't know.
Hard-dollar savings means the money leaves the budget — headcount that isn't backfilled, contract labor that's cancelled, overtime that stops. Soft capacity means the time is freed but the budget doesn't change — the team redeploys the time to other work.
Most ROI calculators add them together. That's how they produce numbers that don't survive a budget review. This one keeps them separate and asks which one applies.
No. It assumes the workflow is already running at its target state. Time to deploy is a project workstream, not an ROI assumption — the one-time cost field captures setup, integration, and initial training, but not the months when you're building.
For a payback projection that includes ramp-up, use seasonality on the volume field or run the calculation at expected steady-state and discount the result.
Because those are finance models, not workflow models. NPV requires a discount rate, cash-flow timing that accounts for when headcount actually drops, and a horizon that matches your investment committee's conventions.
This tool produces the workflow-level inputs those models need. Hand the CSV to your finance partner — don't try to make this page produce a board-room number.
The band applies a percentage swing to your net-savings-per-execution figure, producing the low and high ends of the range. Default is 20% — appropriate when your inputs are measured. Use 10% if every input came from system data. Use 30% or more if any input is an estimate.
The band width is not scientific; it's an honesty signal. A 40% band on a defensible plan beats a 10% band on a guess.
Not usefully. If there's no human labor in the workflow today, there's no time to save — the ROI is a cost question (can AI do it cheaper than the software you already pay for?) rather than a labor substitution.
Fill in the costs and set the time inputs to near-identical values, and you'll get a cost-only view. That's an honest output but a limited one.
Nowhere. Every input is saved to your browser's localStorage on this device. Nothing is sent to a server, no account, no email, no analytics tied to your numbers.
Use CSV or JSON download to move results to a team drive. If you clear your browser data, everything resets — download before clearing.
Five things. Produce a point estimate (every output is a range). Produce an NPV or IRR (that's a finance model). Include qualitative benefits (employee satisfaction, CSAT improvements). Include downstream effects (faster evidence elsewhere). Give you a number to put in a board deck without the assumptions attached — the assumption list is part of the export.